Files
subhobhai943andClaude Opus 4.8 a0cd95cdc9 docs: add Contributing, Security, and Roadmap docs; link them from the README
Create docs/CONTRIBUTING.md (build/verify workflow, coding style, kernel
gotchas, commit & PR conventions), docs/SECURITY.md (supported versions,
private vulnerability reporting, documented caveats), and docs/ROADMAP.md
(shipped in v1.0.0 plus near/mid/long-term plans). Add a Documentation and
Contributing section to the README pointing at all four docs.

Note: used the conventional CONTRIBUTING.md / SECURITY.md filenames (in
docs/) so GitHub auto-detects them as community-health files.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Fh5z6V7nGPbHvqVG5p4CXX
2026-08-30 22:10:28 +05:30

96 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown

<div align="center">
<img src="../assets/logo_SUB_OS.png" alt="SUB-OS logo" width="140" height="140" />
# Security Policy
</div>
SUB-OS is an from-scratch, research/hobby operating system. It is built to be
correct and educational, **not** to be deployed as a hardened production system.
This document explains what is supported, how to report a vulnerability, and the
security caveats you should know before running it anywhere that matters.
---
## Supported versions
| Version | Codename | Status | Security fixes |
|---------|----------|--------|----------------|
| `1.0.0` (`1.0.x`) | Titan | ✅ Current stable | Yes |
| `0.2.x` / `0.0.x` (alpha/beta) | — | ⚠️ Superseded | No |
Only the current stable line receives security fixes. Please upgrade to the
latest [release](https://github.com/subhobhai943/SUB-OS/releases/latest) before
reporting an issue.
---
## Reporting a vulnerability
**Please do not open a public GitHub issue for a security vulnerability.**
Instead, report it privately through GitHub's coordinated-disclosure channel:
1. Go to the repository's **Security** tab →
**[Report a vulnerability](https://github.com/subhobhai943/SUB-OS/security/advisories/new)**.
2. This opens a **private security advisory** visible only to you and the
maintainers.
3. Include:
- Affected version / commit SHA and architecture.
- A description of the class of problem and its impact.
- Minimal steps or a proof-of-concept that reproduces it.
- Any suggested remediation, if you have one.
> Please describe the **class** of problem and its impact rather than publishing
> a weaponized, step-by-step exploit.
### What to expect
- **Acknowledgement:** we aim to confirm receipt within **7 days**.
- **Assessment:** an initial severity assessment and triage within **14 days**.
- **Fix & disclosure:** we coordinate a fix and a disclosure timeline with you,
and credit you in the advisory and release notes (unless you prefer to remain
anonymous).
---
## Known security caveats
SUB-OS deliberately trades several hardening properties for simplicity and
readability at this stage. These are **known and documented**, not bugs:
- **TLS has no certificate verification.** The TLS 1.3 client performs the key
exchange and AEAD correctly but **does not validate the server certificate
chain**. Connections are encrypted but **not authenticated** — they are
trivially MITM-able. Do not use it to protect real secrets.
- **Default credentials are `SUB` / `SUB`.** Every image ships with the same
well-known login. Treat any running instance as unauthenticated.
- **No exploit mitigations yet.** There is no ASLR, no stack canaries in kernel
space, and W^X is not enforced on every mapping. Some segments load RWX.
- **Single-user, cooperative trust model.** Isolation between the ring-3 shell
and the kernel is minimal; the userland is trusted.
- **Networking is best-effort.** The stack is a from-scratch implementation and
has not been fuzzed or audited against hostile packets.
Run SUB-OS in a **VM or emulator (QEMU)**, on isolated networks, and never with
real credentials or sensitive data.
---
## Scope
In scope for a security report:
- Memory-safety faults reachable from the network stack, filesystem parsers, or
the image/crypto codecs.
- Authentication or privilege-boundary bypasses beyond the documented caveats.
- Cryptographic implementation errors (e.g. a broken AEAD or key schedule).
Out of scope (already documented above): the default credentials, the absence
of TLS certificate verification, and the lack of exploit mitigations.
---
Thank you for helping keep SUB-OS and its users safe. 🐉